Earlier today, Omar Al-Bashir, the Sudanese President became the first sitting head of state to be indicted by the International Criminal Court in The Hague in the Netherlands for crimes against humanity in his country’s Darfur Province. We’ll hear the predictable positions from Sudan’s government and the major Western powers of course–the former against the indictment, the former in favor. Is this the right course? What do other voices think outside these two bubbles think? What is stake here? What about what this means for the US occupation of Iraq (despite the fact that the United States is not a signatory to the Court) or former dictators like Pervez Musharaf or human rights abuses by countries like Sri Lanka, Russia in Chechnya, Saudi Arabia’s ruling family, or Israel in Gaza? We have to start somewhere.
What should be done about Sudan’s leader, Omar Al-Bashir?
March 4, 2009 by Sean Jacobs
The right to uphold humanity and the interference of a third nation has resulted in bloody mess (Iraq). Does this mean we should turn a blind eye on crimes on humanity happening in other nations? Make your stance on the situation of arrest warrant for Omar al-Bashir at
http://www.allvoices.com/journalism .
Very Nice Blog.. with my best wishes.
HAZEM
http://www.jordan4ever.com/LiveTv/