I’m struck by the contrast between the mobilization around Darfur and the lack of mobilization around Iraq. The explanation, I believe, lies in the fact that Save Darfur presented the conflict as a tragedy, stripped of politics and context. There were simply “African” victims and “Arab” perpetrators motivated by race-intoxicated hatred. Unlike Iraq, about which Americans felt guilty or impotent, Darfur presented an opportunity to feel good. It appealed to the philanthropic side of the American character. During the presidential election, Save Darfur’s constituency became integrated into the Obama campaign, and I welcomed that opportunity to organize around real concerns. The downside now is the attempt by Save Darfur to pressure the Obama administration to intervene militarily in Darfur.
Read the whole interview with The Boston Globe here.
Mahmood Mamdani on the Save Darfur Campaign
March 22, 2009 by Sean Jacobs
[...] Darfur”: the ultimate absolution? Posted on August 27, 2009 by marakardasnelson By now I’m sure you’ve all heard of Harvard scholar Mahmood Mamdani’s new book, Sa…It appears that I had been living in a whole until recently, blissfully unaware of any sort of [...]